Update July 18th, 2007: The Dover-Phila Credit Union recently ran a hidden word contest on their website. They announced that you could sign up online. Upon going to their website, I noticed that they had a form on a standard HTTP port and they requested your bank account number via a plain text input field. The form was then submitted via email. I notified them of the security risk and they immediately removed the account number field and moved the form to a secure server. See the screenshot.

When it comes to doing banking online, I am very particular and cautious about the websites I use. For the most part, I don’t need to be sold on the bank — I am usually already a member and looking to achieve several tasks:

[Screenshot: Dover Phila Federal Credit Union I have used Chase Online Services and found them to be painless and intuitive, getting out of my way and letting me achieve the tasks I need to achieve. Now, I also do banking with our local Credit Union. They have never had a user-friendly site — but it was bearable. To manage my Visa I logged into their external vendor. To manage my savings, checking, and loans I logged into their external vendor. To order checks I logged into their external vendor. To apply for a loan, I simply visited the office and applied in person (see comments below). I didn’t have to spend much time on their site, just had to have the right bookmarks to get where I needed to be.

The Dover Phila Federal Credit Union recently re-launched their website and I would chalk it up as another failed re-design.

Visually

Normally this isn’t an aspect I would be too picky about. However, the over-use (and poor use) of shadows under every graphical word is a bit sore on the eyes. I imagine they were going for the web 2.0 fade that everyone seems to have used. Also, they have a large rotating banner ad that, normally, would be easy to just glance over. Their navigation is placed above and below — with no way to stop the animation or avoid it (unless I disable via the browser). As I look around, everything seems to be embedded into an image — including their links at the bottom for privacy policy, home-page, and NCUA. Overall, the site has a much darker feel to it than the previous site. Not much clean separation or whitespace. The typography is very plain. Overall a very bland feel. Again, these are my personal feelings. I am not much for the color scheme. I like something a little more upbeat and vibrant like I have found when dealing with Chase, National City, and other Credit Card sites.

Structure and IA

The structure did not have a major shift from the previous design. They don’t have much content for their actual site. They have the basic About Us, Products and Services (what we have to offer), and Contact Us. I appreciate that the main links I use are all placed across the top accordingly. The OnLine-OnTime ™ link is there for me to immediately get to my online banking, Our Rates are listed for a quick check of rates, and Manage Accounts is simply an array of links to send you to all of the third party applications to manage your account, manage your visa, manage your bill pay, and order checks. Thankfully these are placed directly at the top so I don't have to spend much time on the actual site.

Usability

This site only has one form — but it is a major one in that it is the process of applying for a loan. One look at this form forced me to close the browser and apply at the local branch. After the rest of the website, I failed to trust this process with my secure information. The form is poorly organized and constructed. No use of fieldset, legend, or label. Left aligned field labels. Use of drop-downs for state fields. When you get to the point about coapplicant, all coapplicant information is present regardless of if you choose ‘no’ for the field. One click of the submit button takes you to a CGI Application Error page letting you know of the errors. The required fields are not marked or otherwise specified before clicking the submit button, which you will then have to hit your browsers back button to correct the specified errors. This form is not user-friendly by any means, and becomes a nuisance as you actually try to submit the loan. Once submitted — no clear indication is given as to what will happen (Do I call? Will they call? How do I proceed?).

[Screenshot: Dover Phila Federal Credit Union

Under the hood

This was the scariest (and most disappointing) part of it all. Working with a Transitional doctype, tables, font tags galore, Dreamweaver image rollovers and inline Javascript, and the ever secure and impassible — disable right-click script (People really use these and think they work?). Without the use of Javascript, virtually every menu is rendered useless. Images are also required to navigate the site accordingly (obtrusive navigation links). I guess I can’t say they are using all deprecated tags since it is a trans doctype — but boy does it look horrendous under the hood — take a peek for yourself (but be warned).

[Screenshot: Dover Phila Federal Credit Union

Concluding Thoughts

Personally, I feel bad that somebody paid money for a product like this. I feel that there is no excuse to build a website like that anymore — even with tools like Dreamweaver. I understand most of this is code spit out by the WYSIWYG — and not to the fault of Dreamweaver — this is due to ignorant developers. The website is an inaccessible mess and lacks any sort of design direction. I don’t blame this on the Credit Union — they simply took the advice and direction of Prestige Creative Marketing and felt they were going to get a decent product and an upgrade to their website. Unfortunately, this re-design took them backwards — worse than what they had before.

Website:
Dover Phila Federal Credit Union
Developers:
Prestige Creative Marketing

3 Comments Add your comment

  1. Brad April 3rd, 2007

    Nate,

    Have you approached them about these issues? Have you thought about offering them yet another redesign? You never know if they're truly happy with it until you ask them. Who knows...it might be a way to get some extra work if you want it.

    Brad

  2. Nate Klaiber April 3rd, 2007

    RE: Brad
    I have sent several emails simply requesting an archived version of the site to access. Regardless of their response, I don't see this as a complete fault to the Credit Union. It isn't so much that I want the extra work or would build them a re-design - it just happens to be a site in the public sector that I use. The recent re-design only brings more frustrations to using their site. It's not all bad - but compared to other banking sites I use/have used - this one is a mess.

    I don't know what will happen with the site - I do wish there was an archived version I could access just to avoid this one though.

  3. Jamie Chase June 6th, 2007

    Nate,
    I went to TVHS with you and your sister. I’m a communications consultant to credit unions, so you can imagine how surprised I was to read your blog. I’m also disappointed about the web predicament of Dover Phila Credit Union. I live in Seattle now and work with credit unions nationally and internationally, but Dover Phila was my first credit union.

    Because credit unions are not-for-profit and as a member, you are an owner, the marketing director at Dover Phila should be very interested in your feedback. If you find this is not the case, you should contact one of the volunteer board members whom represent you. The thing about credit unions is that they exist ONLY to serve you, not to make a profit. If you feel the new website has decreased service, this is definitely something the board of directors you elected would want to hear about.

    All the best,
    Jamie Chase
    Formerly Jamie Graef of Bolivar, OH
    www.jamiechase.blogspot.com
    www.jayray.com

Leave a comment

Basic HTML is allowed (a href, strong, em, blockquote).